Methodology
How Compare2Best Compares Products and Suppliers
Our comparison methodology is conclusion-first and procurement-oriented: compare the fields that change buying risk, including specifications, certifications, MOQ, lead time, supplier evidence, and data completeness.
Scoring dimensions
- Specification fit: whether measurable specs match the intended use case.
- Certification relevance: whether standards such as IEC 60529, UL, ETL, CE, RoHS, DLC, or Energy Star are applicable and documented.
- Commercial fit: MOQ, sample availability, price range, payment terms, and lead time.
- Supplier evidence: company profile, export history, product consistency, and document quality.
- Data completeness: pages with missing critical procurement fields receive lower confidence.
Pros and cons are mandatory
Procurement content should not only say who should buy. It must also say who should not buy, such as buyers needing unavailable certifications, lower MOQ, local warranty coverage, or fully audited factories.
Human-readable + machine-readable
Pages are written for buyers and structured for search systems: tables, numbered lists, FAQ schema, Product schema where valid, and clear entity names improve both human decisions and AI citation quality.
| Dimension | Example fields | Buyer impact |
|---|---|---|
| Specs | CRI, CCT, IP rating, lumens, material | Fit and performance |
| Compliance | UL, ETL, CE, RoHS, IEC 60529 | Market access |
| Commercial | MOQ, lead time, price range | Feasibility and risk |